Zabala v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency reconsideration is not required when, in the absence of error, the record would still dictate the same conclusion
• holding that a moderate limitation in performing the activities of unskilled work does not prevent a claimant from performing unskilled work
• holding that remand is not required where application of the correct legal principles could lead only to the same conclusion
• holding that remand is not required when “the excluded evidence is essentially duplicative of evidence considered by the ALJ”
• holding that if the ALJ’s further consideration would not have changed an ALJ’s adverse determination, any error in failure to consider such evidence is harmless
• holding that agency reconsideration is not required when, in the absence of error, the record would still dictate the same conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).