Z Technologies Corporation v. The Lubrizol Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Sixth Circuit only applies the continuing violations doctrine in conspiracy and monopolization cases
• “The Sixth Circuit has not addressed FLSA pleading standards, but has emphasized that Twombly does not require heightened fact pleading of specifics.”
• “[P]rofits, sales, and other benefits accrued as a result of an initial wrongful act are not treated as ‘independent acts.’ Rather, they are uniformly viewed as ‘ripples’ caused by the initial injury, not as distinct injuries.. . .”
• continuing violation doctrine pursuant to federal antitrust law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).