Skip to main content
· 9/11/2006

Federal Case

Citations

  • 462 F.3d 920
  • 71 Fed. R. Serv. 245
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming exclusion of opinion connected to the facts by only the expert’s ipse dixit
  • affirming exclusion of expert testimony in part because the expert did not link the agreed-upon fact that a loss of traction can occur with part-time four-wheel drive to the conclusion that the vehicle four-wheel drive system was unsafe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.