· 8/20/1986
Yutkin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Citations
- 497 N.E.2d 471
- 146 Ill. App. 3d 953
- 100 Ill. Dec. 493
- 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the court considered whether an insured met the physical contact requirement when a tire laying in the road was struck causing damage
- physical contact requirement not satisfied where motorist hit piece of tire laying in roadway, causing loss of control
- the allowance of any coverage when indirect physical contact occurs should require \a causal connection consisting of a substantial nexus between the hit-and-run vehicle and the intermediate object\
- the allowance of any coverage when indirect physical contact occurs should require “a causal connection consisting of a substantial nexus between the hit-and-run vehicle and the intermediate object”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNAMARA
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.