Skip to main content
· 8/20/1986

Yutkin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Citations

  • 497 N.E.2d 471
  • 146 Ill. App. 3d 953
  • 100 Ill. Dec. 493
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the court considered whether an insured met the physical contact requirement when a tire laying in the road was struck causing damage
  • physical contact requirement not satisfied where motorist hit piece of tire laying in roadway, causing loss of control
  • the allowance of any coverage when indirect physical contact occurs should require \a causal connection consisting of a substantial nexus between the hit-and-run vehicle and the intermediate object\
  • the allowance of any coverage when indirect physical contact occurs should require “a causal connection consisting of a substantial nexus between the hit-and-run vehicle and the intermediate object”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.