Yusupov v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the Attorney General was not unreasonable ... to ensure that immigration judges do not consider trivial dangers in applying the national security exception”
• noting that the language \ 'danger to the security of the United States' includes an inherent seriousness requirement\
• noting that the language “‘danger to the security of the United States’ includes an inherent seriousness requirement”
• analyzing the scope of § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), prior to Kucana, and suggesting that we do not have jurisdiction to review matters that Congress “specif[ied]” to be in the discre- tion of the Attorney General
• “The Supreme Court has specified that administrative orders are final when they mark the ‘consummation’ of the agency’s decision-making process ----”
• “The Supreme Court has specified that administrative orders are final when they mark the ‘consum mation’ of the agency’s decision-m a king process . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).