Skip to main content

Yusem v. People

Citations

  • 210 P.3d 458
  • 2009 WL 1741973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prior act evidence is admissible to prove elements of the charged offense
  • the first Spoto prong is met if the purpose for which the prior act 23 evidence is offered is somehow probative of an ultimate or intermediate fact
  • “Additionally, the jury instructions did nothing to limit the prejudice and arguably served only to confuse the jury and permit them to rely on the inference of bad character.”
  • “ [The first Spoto ] prong considers not the substance of the prior act evidence , but the fact in the case for which the evidence is offered to prove.”
  • recent application of Spoto test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Eid, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.