YURIAN ESCOBAR v. RAFAEL MARINO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the legislature did not intend convicted felons to pay the cost of DNA testing
• “[B]ecause § 13-610 does not 3 STATE v. NAVARRETTE Decision of the Court require a convicted defendant to be assessed the cost of his DNA testing, there was no basis for the provision to be imposed.”
• we presume the jury followed its instructions
• we presume the jury followed its instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).