Skip to main content
· 3/24/1986

Yuri Fashions Co., Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 632 F. Supp. 41
  • 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 189
  • 10 C.I.T. 189
  • 1986 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “nothing in the legislative history of the General Headnote 3(a) [to the Tariff Schedules of the United States] known to the court indicates that the headnote was intended to regulate anything other than rate of duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiCARLO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.