Skip to main content
· 2/18/2004

Yuka Kato v. Shintaro Ishihara, Governor, and Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Citations

  • 360 F.3d 106
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2620
  • 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,635
  • 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 353
  • 2004 WL 301002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing Tokyo’s work in New York as “basic and routine trade promotional activities”
  • characterizing \product promotion for Japanese companies\ as \governmental\ and, therefore, noncommercial
  • characterizing \product promotion for Japanese companies\ as \governmental\ and, therefore, noncommercial
  • “The promotion abroad of the commerce of domestic firms is a basic — even quintessential-governmental function.”
  • “[T]he fact that a government instrumentality like TMG is engaged in the promotion of commerce does not mean that the instrumentality is thereby engaged in commerce.”
  • governmental activity includes “the employment of diplomatic, civil service, or military personnel” while commercial activity includes “employment or engagement of laborers, clerical staff or public relations or marketing agents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Cabranes, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.