Yuichi Kubota and Ako Watanabe v. Yoshiyuki Shibuya, Shigeo Daimon and Kazuo Okamura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he term ‘burden of proof’ . . . means the burden to establish the proposition at issue by a preponderance of the evidence”
• \ Section 112 does not require that the specification contain that which is known to those skilled in the art. But it does require specificity as to the claim limitations....\
• “Since it is no longer necessary to copy claims to provoke an interference, the ‘old rule’ ‘right to make’ decisions, to the extent they put the burden of proof on the non-moving party ... are inapplicable to a 37 C.F.R. 1.633(a) motion alleging lack of written description support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).