Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. And Placer Service Corporation v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prohibition on mining activities that was withdrawn after six years was a temporary taking and rejecting the government's argument that because the taking was allegedly intended at the outset to be irreversible and for all time it was permanent
• explaining that rental value is a proper means of just compensation for a temporary, physical taking
• explaining that rental value is a proper means of just compensation for a temporary, physical taking
• “[T]emporary reversible takings should be analyzed in the same constitutional framework applied to permanent irreversible takings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).