Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when evidentiary gaps exist in the record, remand for the development of additional evidence is appropriate
• holding that an ALJ is not entitled, as a non-expert, to interpret the voluminous evidence of Plaintiff's physical impairments using common sense
• holding that “an ALJ cannot reject a treating physician’s diagnosis without first attempting to fill any clear gaps in the administrative record”
• holding that an ALJ’s failure to “fulfill his affirmative obligation to develop the administrative record” constitutes legal error
• holding that an ALJ is not entitled, as a non-expert, to interpret the voluminous evidence of plaintiffs physical impairments using his own common sense
• holding that an ALJ’s failure to “fulfill his affirmative obligation to develop the administrative record” constitutes legal error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).