Yousuf v. Cohlmia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Arguably, headaches and stomach upset do not rise to the level of bodily injury contemplated by the policy definition: ‘bodily injury, sickness, or disease.’”
• “policy language referencing ‘the offense’ of ‘the publication of … other defamatory or disparaging material’ is broad enough to support coverage of certain claims for intentional inference with contract or business relations” (emphasis added)
• “policy language referencing ‘the offense’ of ‘the publication of … other defamatory or disparaging material’ is broad enough to support coverage of certain claims for intentional inference with contract or business relations” (emphasis added)
• “policy language referencing ‘the offense’ of ‘the publication of … other defamatory or disparaging material’ is broad enough to support coverage of certain claims for intentional inference with contract or business relations” (Emphasis added)
• “the tort of interference with business relationships is also known as disparagement”
• “the tort of interference with business relationships is also known as disparagement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).