Yount v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert permitted to testify that it is “normal and very common” for abused children to recant their initial reports of child abuse.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Miller
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-01· cited 69×
• Hutton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-28· cited 30×
• Sewell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-29· cited 12×
• Lawson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
• Walter v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-02· cited 6×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-28· cited 107×
• State v. Bricker
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-29· cited 99×
• Bohnert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-07· cited 99×
• State v. Allewalt
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-25· cited 71×
• Consolidated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Ball
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-11-10· cited 46×
• Saul v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-22· cited 38×
• State v. Saul
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-07· cited 34×
• Crews v. Director of Patuxent Institution
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-01-11· cited 30×
• State v. Tull
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-08-20· cited 28×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-01· cited 7×
• Spann v. Bees
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-11-15· cited 6×