Younker v. Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we would not consider an argument that preferential treatment of gear license holders discriminated against an applicant where he had not shown injury from that preference
• holding that we would not consider an argument that preferential treatment of gear license holders discriminated against an applicant where he had not shown injury from that preference
• declining to consider preparatory efforts to fish as past participation because \past participation coincides with the legislative view that hardship be measured according to the actual taking of fish in the past\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).