Skip to main content
· 11/21/1962

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn

Citations

  • 363 S.W.2d 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that judgment was final when it expressly dismissed claims against some defendants, the only remaining defendant was unserved, and “there [was] nothing to indicate that petitioner ever expected to obtain service upon him”
  • concluding that an order granting summary judgment was final where one of the parties listed in the petition was never served nor answered, and nothing indicated that petitioner ever expected to obtain service upon him
  • holding order of summary judgment was final as it disposed of all served defendants and impliedly nonsuited unserved defendant
  • observing that nothing in record indicated that plaintiff ever expected to obtain service upon remaining party
  • concluding judgment was to be regarded as final for purposes of appeal when it expressly disposed of all named parties except one who was never served with citation and did not answer
  • concluding judgment was to be regarded as final for purposes of appeal when it expressly disposed of all named parties except one who was never served with citation and did not answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.