Skip to main content
· 10/18/1963

Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout

Citations

  • 266 Minn. 450
  • 124 N.W.2d 328
  • 1963 Minn. LEXIS 753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a second action was barred after judgment was entered in the first action
  • stating that a second action was barred after judgment was entered in the first action
  • stating that “when [the state] descends to the level of those with whom it associates and interests itself in any property and proprietary rights as distinguished from governmental prerogatives, it subjects itself to the same liability as any other litigant”
  • to seek certiorari one must be a party in form or substance
  • “In order for an accord and satisfaction to exist, there must be an honest dispute between the parties, [and] a tender with the explicit understanding of both parties that it was in full payment of all demands * * (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Sheran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.