Youngblood v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s motion for continuance where defendant failed to act with diligence in arranging for counsel to represent him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jacks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-11-12· cited 12×
• Kenneth Charles Saulsberry v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2007-06-20

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• May v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1954-10-27· cited 11×