YOUNG, WELDON, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we review “decisions on asylum, withholding of removal, and [Convention Against Torture] protection” for substantial evidence (citation omitted)
• explaining that “‘[i]f a petitioner fails to raise a particular issue when he appeals to the [BIA],’ the petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to that issue.” (citation omitted)
• finding the IJ provided due process by asking “relevant fact questions” and then “three open-ended questions allowing [the petitioner] an opportunity to elaborate”
• requiring a petitioner to show a fundamental procedural error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim
• distinguishing Al Khouri by noting that “the IJ did not curtail Ramirez’s testimony or prevent her from telling her whole story” and “gave her repeated opportunities to expound on her claim”
• standard of review; a noncitizen must demonstrate both a fundamental error and prejudice to establish a due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).