Young v. Young
Citations
- 89 Va. 675
- 17 S.E. 470
- 1893 Va. LEXIS 86
Syllabus
<p>1. Contingent Remainders— Attachment.—A contingent remainder which is a mere possibility is not within Code 1873, ch. 148, § 1, allowing an attachment against “ estates or debts ” in certain cases.</p> <p>2. Idem—-Conveyances.—A contingent remainder which is, however, an “ interest or claim ” to real estate may be conveyed under Code, § 2418.</p> <p>3. Idem—Estoppel.—A conveyance of a contingent remainder, if made with general warranty of title, would operate as an estoppel as against the grantor subsequently claiming that he had no estate in the real estate conveyed at the date of the conveyance. Burtners v. Keran, 24 Gratt. 42.</p>
Judges: Hinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-10-30· cited 47×
- Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1930-11-13· cited 39×
- Edmiston v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1961-06-27· cited 30×
- Nichols v. GuthrieTennessee Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 22×
- Moore v. SharpeSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1909-07-12· cited 21×
- Howbert v. CauthornSupreme Court of Virginia· 1902-11-20· cited 18×
- Methodist Protestant Church v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1902-02-18· cited 17×
- Ætna Life Ins. v. HoppinSeventh Circuit· 1914-01-12· cited 15×
- Weddle v. Nunley (In re Weddle)E.D. Virginia· 1984-10-22· cited 4×
- In re CamdenW.D. Virginia· 1963-05-08· cited 2×
- Larkin v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia· 1946-09-11· cited 1×
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1876-06-15
- Bowman v. MericleNorfolk County Circuit Court· 2005-08-31
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.