Young v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting collateral consequences argument, and stating that case did not satisfy “public importance” element of “capable of repetition” test because of unique factual record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Putman v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-07-18· cited 73×
• Ten Voters of Biddeford v. City of Biddeford
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-04-25· cited 31×
• Judy Sparks v. Brant Sparks
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-04-04· cited 28×
• In Re Walter R.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-06-11· cited 27×
• In Re Christopher H.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2011-01-18· cited 19×
• Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. Pineo
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-02-18· cited 15×
• Young v. Young
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-04-06· cited 14×
• Leigh v. Superintendent, Augusta Mental Health Institute
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-02-28· cited 9×
• Gauthier v. Gauthier
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-09-25· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-10-18· cited 57×
• King Resources Co. v. Environmental Improvement Commission
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1970-11-19· cited 52×
• Sordyl v. Sordyl
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-04-29· cited 24×
• Monroe v. Town of Gray
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-12-17· cited 13×
• In Re Misty B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-04-19· cited 12×
• In Re Janna Lynn M.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-03-27· cited 3×