Skip to main content
· 9/20/2004

Young v. Workman

Citations

  • 383 F.3d 1233
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19540
  • 2004 WL 2091987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that excluded evidence wasn’t material in absence of any indication it “would have created reasonable doubt had it been introduced”
  • “[A] finding [of willfulness] is not required for exclusion to be justified as a sanction for discovery violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McWilliams, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.