· 9/20/2004
Young v. Workman
Citations
- 383 F.3d 1233
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19540
- 2004 WL 2091987
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that excluded evidence wasn’t material in absence of any indication it “would have created reasonable doubt had it been introduced”
- “[A] finding [of willfulness] is not required for exclusion to be justified as a sanction for discovery violations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, McWilliams, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.