Skip to main content
· 4/6/1915

Young v. Wolff

Citations

  • 190 Mo. App. 48
  • 175 S.W. 248
  • 1915 Mo. App. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the original act is to be read as if it contained the provisions of the amendatory act, as to all authorized actions [occurring] after the passage of the latter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Nortoni, Reynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.