Young v. Wiggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the use of the eminent domain power to create a private lake for private purposes was unconstitutional under the South Carolina Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Karesh v. CITY COUN. OF CITY OF CHARLESTON
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-08-31· cited 13×
• Clemson University v. First Provident Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-07-12· cited 10×
• Main v. Thomason
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-14· cited 10×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-06· cited 3×
• Chimney Rock Irr. Dist. v. FAWCUS SPRINGS IRR.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1984-12-07· cited 3×
• Karesh v. City Council
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-08-31· cited 3×
• Chimney Rock Irrigation District v. Fawcus Springs Irrigation District
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1984-12-07· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edens v. City of Columbia
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-01-30· cited 41×
• Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-06-12· cited 34×
• Bangor & Piscataquis Railroad v. McComb
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1872-07-01· cited 22×