Young v. Toys R US, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the plaintiff’s claims to be time-barred, even though the delay was attributable to the trial court’s failure to grant a motion to amend within the ninety-day time frame

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).