Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 725 N.E.2d 78
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 207
  • 2000 WL 280408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s “taking of property include[d] his actions in effecting his escape.”
  • holding whether a bodily injury is “serious” is a “a matter of degree and therefore a question reserved for the factfinder”
  • holding force that occurred after Young took victim’s wallet sufficient to satisfy element for robbery
  • providing that Young’s snatching of money, exertion of force, and escape were so connected in time, place, and continuity that Young’s taking of property included his actions in effecting his escape
  • explaining that whether a bodily injury is “serious” “has been held to be a matter of degree and Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 71A03-1605-CR-1034 | January 13, 2017 Page 5 of 6 therefore a question reserved for the factfinder”
  • affirming defendant’s conviction for robbery as a class A felony because the record contained “substantial probative evidence from which the factfinder could reasonably find serious bodily injury beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.