District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/29/1988
Young v. State
Citations
- 522 So. 2d 540
- 13 Fla. L. Weekly 807
- 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235
- 1988 WL 26276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remand for new trial required where court improperly restricted defendant's cross-examination of key prosecution witness on matters crucial to witness' credibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Nesbitt, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.