Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 522 So. 2d 540
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 807
  • 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1235
  • 1988 WL 26276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remand for new trial required where court improperly restricted defendant's cross-examination of key prosecution witness on matters crucial to witness' credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Nesbitt, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.