Court of Appeals of Texas· 11/3/1982
Young v. State
Citations
- 644 S.W.2d 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting Article 39.14 to mean “sole” possession of the State
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Morse and James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-21· cited 38×
- Bachus v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-01-08· cited 24×
- Swanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-18· cited 23×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-12-19· cited 22×
- Showery v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1985-05-08· cited 19×
- Mullen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-01-15· cited 15×
- Liveoak v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1986-08-29· cited 14×
- Bradeen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-03-07· cited 4×
- Jacob Cory Gonzales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-07-15
- Gilbert Vasquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2005-08-25
- Holley, Aramus Deshon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-21
- Andrew Gibbs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-06-14
- Larry Gene Strickland II v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2026-03-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.