Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 236 S.E.2d 1
  • 239 Ga. 53
  • 1977 Ga. LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that juror’s “indication of ‘reservations’ does not prevent the verdict from being unanimous. The requirement is that a juror agree to a verdict.”
  • stating that juror’s poll response that he had “reservations” did not prevent the verdict from being unanimous; only requirement 3 was that juror agree to verdict, which he did
  • “The indication of‘reservations’ does not prevent the verdict from being unanimous. The requirement is that a juror agree to a verdict.”
  • 13 month break in publicity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.