· 12/1/2008
Young v. Shore
Citations
- 588 F. Supp. 2d 544
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97160
- 2008 WL 5061161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 41 (2008), to determine that because plaintiff is a beneficiary of the estate, she was in privity with the estate for purposes of the prior action and issue preclusion barred the subsequent action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farnan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.