Skip to main content
· 12/1/2008

Young v. Shore

Citations

  • 588 F. Supp. 2d 544
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97160
  • 2008 WL 5061161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 41 (2008), to determine that because plaintiff is a beneficiary of the estate, she was in privity with the estate for purposes of the prior action and issue preclusion barred the subsequent action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farnan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.