Skip to main content
· 4/1/1985

Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co. & Uni-Line Division

Citations

  • 110 A.D.2d 920
  • 489 N.Y.S.2d 1016
  • 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied, because there were issues of fact relevant to whether information plaintiff sought to enjoin defendant from disclosing constituted trade secrets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.