Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a person or entity who 3 is a “self-insurer” is not a “liability insurer,” and concluding that Florida's uninsured motorist statute treats a motorist who is self-insured as an uninsured motorist
• using this “principle of statutory construction” to show that “[b]y failing to permit self-insured mo- torist policy exclusions in the list of authorized exclusions, the Leg- islature has . . . indicated its intent . . . not to permit self-insured motorist policy exclusions”
• \[S]ection 627.727(9) . . . provides a list of statutorily permissible policy exclusions to uninsured motorist coverage.\
• “Under the principle of statutory construction, expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another.” (citation omitted)
• “The critical question in determining whether a motorist is uninsured or underinsured is whether the tortfeasor possesses insurance that will make the injured party whole.”
• “[T]he mention of one thing implies right to immediate monetary relief; b. the rights or obligations of a party regarding child custody or time-sharing under a parenting plan; or c. that a marital agreement is invalid in its entirety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).