· 9/9/2014
Young v. Prizm Asset Management Co.
Citations
- 100 A.3d 594
- 2014 Pa. Super. 195
- 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2900
- 2014 WL 4414847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that summary judgment was not appropriate when a business invitee’s evidence created a question for the jury of whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of criminal acts of third persons
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazarus, Wecht, Musmanno
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.