Skip to main content
· 4/11/1983

Young v. Pease

Citations

  • 448 N.E.2d 586
  • 114 Ill. App. 3d 120
  • 69 Ill. Dec. 868
  • 1983 Ill. App. LEXIS 1711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where deponent “has not made deliberate, repeated and unequivocal statements, it is possible, for purposes of a motion for summary judgment, to controvert the claimed admissions made in those statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.