Young v. Mills

Citations

• 56 Pa. Super. 134
• 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 58

Syllabus

<p>Master and servant — -Wages—-Deduction for store bills.</p> <p>1. In an action against a corporation for wages where the defendant sets up as a defense an alleged oral agreement by which the plaintiff agreed that Ms store bills at a store owned by the defendant’s president should be deducted from his wages, and the evidence as to such a contract is conflicting, the case is for the jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff will be sustained.</p> <p>2. Where the existence or the terms of a contract, and not its validity or construction is the issue, and the evidence is conflicting, or the question depends on the intention of the parties, the question of the existence of the terms of the contract, is one for the jury.</p>