· 5/20/1977
Young v. Mikva
Citations
- 363 N.E.2d 851
- 66 Ill. 2d 579
- 6 Ill. Dec. 904
- 1977 Ill. LEXIS 305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of administrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congressional seat
- distinguish- ing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of admin- istrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congres- sional seat
- distinguish- ing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of admin- istrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congres- sional seat
- because the right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, courts have no jurisdiction over such matters unless provided by statute
- because the right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, courts have no jurisdiction over such matters unless provided by statute
- “The right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, and a court has no jurisdiction over such matters unless a statute so provides.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Underwood, Moran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.