Skip to main content
· 5/20/1977

Young v. Mikva

Citations

  • 363 N.E.2d 851
  • 66 Ill. 2d 579
  • 6 Ill. Dec. 904
  • 1977 Ill. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of administrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congressional seat
  • distinguish- ing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of admin- istrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congres- sional seat
  • distinguish- ing Roudebush as upholding constitutionality of admin- istrative recount of ballots under state procedures, rather than sanctioning election contest for congres- sional seat
  • because the right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, courts have no jurisdiction over such matters unless provided by statute
  • because the right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, courts have no jurisdiction over such matters unless provided by statute
  • “The right to contest an election was not recognized at common law, and a court has no jurisdiction over such matters unless a statute so provides.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Underwood, Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.