Young v. Kellar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that other bad acts evidence was not admissible to show intent because the defendant had specifically conceded the mens rea element when he informed the court that it could omit that element from the jury instructions
• finding that in general, State may not introduce Rule 404(b) evidence where defendant has stipulated to the relevant element of the charged crime
• explaining why we confine our review of pre-trial evidentiary rulings to the pre-trial record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).