Young v. Hobart West Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s termination four months after whistle-blowing activity did not, without more, suggest causal link
• holding that a plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie retaliation case where there was insufficient evidence that she complained to the employees involved in her termination
• ruling plaintiff’s termination four months after engaging in whistle-blowing activity did not, without more facts, suggest a causal link
• ruling plaintiff’s termination four months after engaging in whistle-blowing activity did not, without more facts, suggest a causal link
• holding plaintiff must provide more than \her own unsubstantiated conclusory allegations\ to survive summary judgment
• reasoning that employee failed to establish causation, in part, because her employer sought to address the issue about which she complained prior to her discrimination complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).