Young v. Edelstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to record statements did not violate the due process clause of either the state or federal constitution
• stating that assault with intent to commit rape would be the appropriate charge where there has been an attempted but unsuccessful rape which included an assault
• stating that assault with intent to commit rape would be the appropriate charge where there has been an attempted but unsuccessful rape which included an assault
• noting that requiring recording of interrogations might enhance reliability of confessions
• noting that requiring recording of interrogations might enhance reliability of confessions
• “we are aware of nothing in the language or history of the California constitutional due process provisions which would support a construction of that charter which mandates a more stringent standard than that of the [fourteenth [amendment [to the United States constitution]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).