Young v. Duvall
Citations
- 109 U.S. 573
- 3 S. Ct. 414
- 27 L. Ed. 1036
- 1883 U.S. LEXIS 998
Syllabus
<p>Acknowledgment — Deed—Husband and Wife.</p> <p>In a suit to set aside a deed of trust executed to secure the payment of a note signed by husband and wife, and the acknowledgment of which was certified as required by law, it was in proof that the wife signed the note and the deed, having an opportunity to read both before signing them ; she was beforo an officer competent to take her acknowledgment, and he came into her presence, at the request of the husband, to take it; and she know, or could have ascertained, while in the presence of. the officer, as well to what property the deed referred as the object of its execution ; Held, that the certificate must stand against a mere conflict of evidence as to whether she willingly signed, sealed, and delivered the deed, or had its contents explained to her by the officer, or was examined privily and apart from her husband ; and that even if it be only prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated, it cannot be impeached, in respect to those facts, except upon proof which clearly and fully shows it to be false or fraudulent.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring proof “of such a character as will clearly and fully show the certificate to be false or fraudulent” to contradict a certificate of acknowledgment to a conveyance of real estate
- requiring proof “of such a character as will clearly and fully show the certificate to be false or fraudulent” to contradict a certificate of acknowledg- ment to a conveyance of real estate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ponsetti v. GE Pension PlanSeventh Circuit· 2010-07-30· cited 109×
- Hitz v. JenksSupreme Court· 1887-11-14· cited 29×
- Butler v. Encyclopedia Brittanica, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1994-11-23· cited 28×
- Bank of Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-02-15· cited 25×
- Popovitch v. KasperlikW.D. Pennsylvania· 1947-02-28· cited 17×
- Phillips v. BishopNebraska Supreme Court· 1892-10-26· cited 13×
- Picetti v. OrcioNevada Supreme Court· 1936-06-30· cited 11×
- Iantosca v. IantoscaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-05-03· cited 11×
- Vanderveer v. WarnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1921-06-25· cited 8×
- Crawford State Bank v. McEwenNebraska Supreme Court· 1937-03-23· cited 7×
- Northwestern Loan & Banking Co. v. JonasenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-06-26· cited 6×
- Adams v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court· 1903-01-10· cited 4×
- Colonial Building & Loan Ass'n v. GriffinNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1915-12-10· cited 3×
- Mather v. JarelU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1888-01-11· cited 3×
- Linder v. Hyattsville Auto & Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1951-11-30· cited 2×
- Albany County Savings Bank v. McCartyNew York Supreme Court· 1893-09-15· cited 2×
- Hamling v. Ætna Life Ins.Eighth Circuit· 1929-07-15· cited 2×
- Smith v. RauhPutnam Circuit Court· 1910-03-15· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1994-12-20· cited 1×
- Marden v. DorthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1896-12-16· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.