Young v. Duckworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is obvious in this case that neither [trial court] had jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus inasmuch as petitioner was serving time under a proper commitment, his sentence had not expired and he had not been denied good time or credit time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Young v. Duckworth

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Young v. Duckworth
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 10×
• Young v. Duckworth
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-03-14
• Young v. Duckworth
  Supreme Court· 1980-11-03