Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that under the FLSA, plaintiffs were entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs associated with the appeal and remanding to the district court for a determination
• holding that an FLSA plaintiff’s “entitlement to fees and costs extends to [an] appeal”
• holding that an FLSA plaintiff's “entitlement to fees and costs extends to fan] appeal”
• explaining that a showing of \[m]ere negligence is insufficient\ to establish willfulness
• remanding the case “to the district court for the proper determination of appellate fees and costs owed to Young,” the prevailing plaintiff and appellee
• criticizing Dingwall as an example of a court “either misapplying] (or ignoring] altogether) the requirement that the plaintiffs knowledge be of the type customarily required by a prolonged course of advanced intellectual study”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).