Young v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The limiting of the argument is always in the sound discretion of the trial court and only when that discretion is abused will this court reverse a judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Privitt v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1938-01-28· cited 31×
• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1910-09-21· cited 27×
• Combs v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1895-02-26· cited 18×
• Conners v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1913-02-05· cited 8×
• Scott v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-04-30· cited 6×
• Stout v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-05-07· cited 5×
• Lucas v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1912-09-26· cited 5×
• Mabry v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1924-01-15· cited 2×