Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board properly denied a parolee credit on his sentence for time spent on parole where his “street time” was marked with delinquency and failure to comply with conditions of parole
• holding that the Board properly denied a parolee credit on his sentence for time spent on parole where his \street time\ was marked with delinquency and failure to comply with conditions of parole
• holding that the Board properly denied a parolee credit on 428,437,409 his sentence for time spent on parole where his \street time\ was marked with delinquency and failure to comply with conditions of parole
• concluding that “a denial of credit does not constitute an enhancement of a sentence so as to raise federal constitutional implications” and citing with approval Pennsylvania cases holding that the denial of credit does not contravene the ex post facto clause
• explaining that the Board’s recalculation of sentence of convicted parole violator is “not an encroachment upon the judicial sentencing power”
• explaining that the Board’s recalculation of a CPV’s sentence “is not an encroachment upon the judicial sentencing power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).