Skip to main content

Young v. Clark

Citations

  • 814 P.2d 364
  • 10 A.L.R. 5th 1074
  • 15 Brief Times Rptr. 962
  • 1991 Colo. LEXIS 427
  • 1991 WL 123095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e reject plaintiffs’ argument that such an instruction has no place in a comparative fault scheme.”
  • considers those jurisdictions which have abolished the doctrine and chooses to leave the doctrine intact for Colorado

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vollack, Lohr, Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.