Skip to main content
· 8/21/1990

Young v. City of Philadelphia

Citations

  • 744 F. Supp. 673
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11222
  • 1990 WL 132582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the burden rests on the fee applicant to establish the exception
  • imposing a 20% reduction in hours for block billing and “unintelligible and inconsistent time entries.”
  • imposing a 20% reduction in hours for block billing and “unintelligible and inconsistent 8 For example, on October 8, 2018, Mr. Beers billed for “Multiple emails with opposing counsel re pre-trial issues (.5); draft Amended Joint Report (1.5
  • finding reasonable $695/hour for a partner in Richmond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antwerpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.