Skip to main content

Young v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 568 N.E.2d 18
  • 209 Ill. App. 3d 84
  • 154 Ill. Dec. 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unlike purely statutory right, accrued common-law right of action could not be barred by retrospective application of legislation
  • court rejects CTA’s argument that O’Mahoney was not a public transit security expert, finding argument was waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Young v. Chicago Transit Authority

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.