Skip to main content
· 12/13/2005

Young v. American Airlines, Inc.

Citations

  • 182 S.W.3d 647
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1840
  • 2005 WL 3372770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “the relevant analysis focuses on the employee’s overall work record and general ability to perform [his or her] job duties, not whether the employee violated a company rule or policy on one occasion, such as in this case.”
  • stating “the relevant analysis focuses on the employee’s overall work record and general ability to perform [his or her] job duties, not whether the employee violated a company rule or policy on one occasion, such as in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenneth M. Romines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.