Young Refining Corp. v. Pennzoil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]et profits agreement contains no indication of an intent to benefit Young Refining. Young Refining is not mentioned in the agreement, and all of the obligations flow between [the parties to the agreement]. Young Refining would have benefitted, but only incidentally, by the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).