Young Jin Choi v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting challenge to three‐year disqualification where two stores that accept food stamps were located within three blocks of plaintiffʹs store
• irreparable harm established where plaintiffs affidavit attested to a 40% loss of business if his store is disqualified
• “A sanction is not arbitrary and capricious when a federal agency properly adheres to its own regulations and guidelines when imposing it.”
• stay applicant has rigorous burden of proof when movant seeks to stay governmental action taken in the public interest
• interpreting the Food Stamp Act of 1977

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).